背景

由于精准医学和人工智能的飞速发展，护理与工程学之间的跨学科合作已经出现。尽管工程学对于解决复杂的护理问题和促进医疗保健至关重要，但尚未充分阐明这两个领域之间的合作。

目标

确定护理和工程学之间的跨学科协作研究领域，特别是关注护士在协作中的作用。

方法

本研究中，使用 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews方法进行综述。 2020年11月22日在PubMed，CINAHL，Scopus，Embase，Web of Science，ScienceDirect，电气和电子工程师协会数字图书馆以及计算机科学数字图书馆协会等数据库对公开发表的文献进行全面检索。数据审查和提取由两名审核员独立进行。如果有异议通过讨论或与第三人协商解决。通过描述性统计和内容分析对数据进行分析。并在在跨学科协作模型中对结果进行可视化。

结果

文献检索了6,752项研究，其中60项研究符合纳入标准。跨学科合作的研究领域集中在患者安全（n = 18），症状监测和健康管理（n = 18），信息系统和护理人力资源管理（n = 16），健康教育（n = 5）和护理-患者交流（n = 3）。护士在跨学科协作中的角色分为四个主题：需求分析员（n = 21），设计人员（n = 22），测试员（n = 37）和评估员（n = 49）。基于这些结果，构建了跨学科协作模型。

结论

护理与工程学之间的跨学科合作促进了护理创新和实践。但是，这些合作仍处于初期阶段。未来，护士应该更多地参与解决医疗保健问题的早期阶段，尤其是在需求分析和设计阶段。通过开展跨专业教育，护理与医疗工程行业建立紧密联系，以及为护理工程合作创造更多机会，护理科学可能会从更深入的参与中受益。

 

 

Background

Due to the rapid advancements in precision medicine and artificial intelligence, interdisciplinary collaborations between nursing and engineering have emerged. Although engineering is vital in solving complex nursing problems and advancing healthcare, the collaboration between the two fields has not been fully elucidated.

Objectives

To identify the study areas of interdisciplinary collaboration between nursing and engineering in health care, particularly focusing on the role of nurses in the collaboration.

Methods

In this study, a scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews was performed. A comprehensive search for published literature was conducted using the PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Digital Library, and Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library from inception to November 22, 2020. Data screening and extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Any discrepancies in results were resolved through discussions or in consultation with a third reviewer. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and content analysis. Results were visualized in an interdisciplinary collaboration model.

Results

We identified 6,752 studies through the literature search, and 60 studies met the inclusion criteria. The study areas of interdisciplinary collaboration concentrated on patient safety (n=18), symptom monitoring and health management (n=18), information system and nursing human resource management (n=16), health education (n=5), and nursing-patient communication (n=3). The roles of nurses in the interdisciplinary collaboration were divided into four themes: requirement analyst (n=21), designer (n=22), tester(n=37) and evaluator (n=49). Based on these results, an interdisciplinary collaboration model was constructed.

Conclusions

Interdisciplinary collaborations between nursing and engineering promote nursing innovation and practice. However, these collaborations are still emerging and in the early stages. In the future, nurses should be more involved in the early stages of solving healthcare problems, particularly in the requirement analysis and designing phases. Nursing science might benefit from deeper involvement by developing interprofessional education, building nursing relationships with the healthcare engineering industry, and creating more opportunities for nursing engineering collaborations like maker-space facilities and hackathons.

Keywords

Engineering

Interdisciplinary collaboration

Nursing

Nurse-engineer

原文链接：

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020748921000328